A recent study from the University of Bonn reveals a significant shift in public attitudes towards agricultural photovoltaic systems (agri-PV) compared to conventional solar parks. The research shows that many citizens favor agri-PV, perceiving it as a more attractive use of land, particularly when agricultural practices co-exist with solar energy generation. The study, which surveyed nearly 2,000 individuals, illustrates strong support for dual land use, with a notable percentage willing to pay more for electricity from these systems.
The construction of solar parks often faces opposition from local communities; however, skepticism appears to diminish when solar panels are integrated with agriculture. The University of Bonn’s research indicates that citizens tend to rate agri-PV installations much more favorably than traditional solar parks. To reach these findings, researchers surveyed nearly 2,000 individuals about their perspectives on ground-mounted solar systems. Before forming opinions, participants were informed about the advantages and disadvantages of both agri-PV and conventional solar farms.
In a subsequent phase of the study, participants were divided into three groups, each shown different scenarios: one group viewed images of a cattle pasture alongside long rows of solar panels, another looked at a wheat field with and without panels, and the third was shown vineyards contrasting with a conventional solar park landscape. The study assessed participants’ views on how these installations influenced the attractiveness of the landscapes and their recreational value.
According to Hendrik Zeddies from the Centre for Development Research (ZEF) at the University of Bonn, the findings are noteworthy. Nearly 44 percent of participants indicated they would be willing to pay higher prices for electricity generated in agri-PV areas, compared to just 29 percent for standard solar parks. The financial willingness is further underscored by the finding that only 2.9 percent would pay to prevent an agri-PV project, in contrast to 4.8 percent against a conventional solar park. While the share of dissenters is small, it reflects a more significant opposition to traditional solar developments when compared to agri-PV.