A group of retired military leaders argues that investment in renewable energy should be classified as part of national defense budgets, emphasizing that climate change poses a security threat. They advocate for shifting funds from military spending to low-carbon energy to enhance resilience against potential aggressors, particularly in light of rising tensions with Russia. By counting renewable energy investments in NATO’s 1.5% critical infrastructure budget, the signatories believe nations can reduce reliance on fossil fuels and bolster their security against geopolitical risks.
In a letter addressed to European leaders, retired military officials, including former generals and admirals, emphasize the importance of shifting defense investments toward renewable energy as a response to climate-related threats. They contend that the UK’s and Europe’s dependence on foreign fossil fuels compromises security and creates vulnerabilities, particularly during geopolitical conflicts, as witnessed during the Ukraine crisis. They advocate incorporating clean energy into the 1.5% NATO budget for critical infrastructure.
Retired Lt Gen Richard Nugee, who signed the letter, argued that renewable energy sources, such as wind and solar, provide more reliable security than relying on additional gas supplies. He noted that diverse energy systems are less susceptible to attacks, essential for a robust defense posture. V Adm Ben Bekkering, another signatory, called for a broader understanding of security challenges, advocating for sustainable military, economic, and ecological policies to address aggression.
The call for robust climate action comes amid growing recognition among military leadership regarding the climate crisis’s potential impacts. However, it remains uncertain whether this will translate into prioritization by government officials. A recent report by the Joint Intelligence Committee, which warned of risks to the UK from collapsing ecosystems like the Amazon, was suppressed by Downing Street. Meanwhile, many nations are reducing foreign aid to countries impacted by climate issues while increasing defense spending.
Experts like Gareth Redmond-King, from the Energy and Climate Intelligence Unit, argue that transitioning to clean energy is crucial for achieving net-zero emissions and enhancing national security. This shift would help break dependence on authoritarian regimes controlling fossil fuel resources, whose conflicts have contributed to rising energy prices. In response, a UK government spokesperson highlighted a commitment to national security, including spending aimed at fostering a clean energy future, meant to reduce fossil fuel price volatility while supporting job creation and addressing climate challenges.